Company AI fingerprint

Two companies, six capability axes, one chart. Where each polygon bulges tells you what that company is actually building. The asymmetries — not the absolute values — are the story.

Company A:
Company B:
Foundation trainingFoundation training Anthropic: 45% (109/243) Adobe: 31% (86/280)45% / 31%Inference infraInference infra Anthropic: 53% (130/243) Adobe: 52% (146/280)53% / 52%Agent platformAgent platform Anthropic: 31% (76/243) Adobe: 54% (151/280)31% / 54%Eval & safetyEval & safety Anthropic: 64% (155/243) Adobe: 41% (116/280)64% / 41%RAG / retrievalRAG / retrieval Anthropic: 10% (24/243) Adobe: 30% (83/280)10% / 30%Robotics + multimodalRobotics + multimodal Anthropic: 7% (17/243) Adobe: 32% (89/280)7% / 32%Research depthResearch depth Anthropic: 30% (74/243) Adobe: 10% (28/280)30% / 10%Anthropic · Foundation training: 45% (109/243)Anthropic · Inference infra: 53% (130/243)Anthropic · Agent platform: 31% (76/243)Anthropic · Eval & safety: 64% (155/243)Anthropic · RAG / retrieval: 10% (24/243)Anthropic · Robotics + multimodal: 7% (17/243)Anthropic · Research depth: 30% (74/243)Adobe · Foundation training: 31% (86/280)Adobe · Inference infra: 52% (146/280)Adobe · Agent platform: 54% (151/280)Adobe · Eval & safety: 41% (116/280)Adobe · RAG / retrieval: 30% (83/280)Adobe · Robotics + multimodal: 32% (89/280)Adobe · Research depth: 10% (28/280)Anthropic· 243 AI roles, 6 regulatedAdobe· 280 AI roles, 1 regulated
Each axis = share of company’s tagged AI roles touching that capability cluster. Outer ring = 100%, inner ring = 25%. Hover any vertex for the underlying count.

Suggested comparisons