Company AI fingerprint

Two companies, six capability axes, one chart. Where each polygon bulges tells you what that company is actually building. The asymmetries — not the absolute values — are the story.

Company A:
Company B:
Foundation trainingFoundation training Anthropic: 45% (109/243) OpenAI: 27% (62/230)45% / 27%Inference infraInference infra Anthropic: 53% (130/243) OpenAI: 48% (111/230)53% / 48%Agent platformAgent platform Anthropic: 31% (76/243) OpenAI: 37% (84/230)31% / 37%Eval & safetyEval & safety Anthropic: 64% (155/243) OpenAI: 58% (133/230)64% / 58%RAG / retrievalRAG / retrieval Anthropic: 10% (24/243) OpenAI: 13% (30/230)10% / 13%Robotics + multimodalRobotics + multimodal Anthropic: 7% (17/243) OpenAI: 7% (17/230)7% / 7%Research depthResearch depth Anthropic: 30% (74/243) OpenAI: 14% (32/230)30% / 14%Anthropic · Foundation training: 45% (109/243)Anthropic · Inference infra: 53% (130/243)Anthropic · Agent platform: 31% (76/243)Anthropic · Eval & safety: 64% (155/243)Anthropic · RAG / retrieval: 10% (24/243)Anthropic · Robotics + multimodal: 7% (17/243)Anthropic · Research depth: 30% (74/243)OpenAI · Foundation training: 27% (62/230)OpenAI · Inference infra: 48% (111/230)OpenAI · Agent platform: 37% (84/230)OpenAI · Eval & safety: 58% (133/230)OpenAI · RAG / retrieval: 13% (30/230)OpenAI · Robotics + multimodal: 7% (17/230)OpenAI · Research depth: 14% (32/230)Anthropic· 243 AI roles, 6 regulatedOpenAI· 230 AI roles, 9 regulated
Each axis = share of company’s tagged AI roles touching that capability cluster. Outer ring = 100%, inner ring = 25%. Hover any vertex for the underlying count.

Suggested comparisons