Company AI fingerprint

Two companies, six capability axes, one chart. Where each polygon bulges tells you what that company is actually building. The asymmetries — not the absolute values — are the story.

Company A:
Company B:
Foundation trainingFoundation training Anthropic: 45% (109/243) Salesforce: 12% (16/138)45% / 12%Inference infraInference infra Anthropic: 53% (130/243) Salesforce: 26% (36/138)53% / 26%Agent platformAgent platform Anthropic: 31% (76/243) Salesforce: 94% (130/138)31% / 94%Eval & safetyEval & safety Anthropic: 64% (155/243) Salesforce: 52% (72/138)64% / 52%RAG / retrievalRAG / retrieval Anthropic: 10% (24/243) Salesforce: 31% (43/138)10% / 31%Robotics + multimodalRobotics + multimodal Anthropic: 7% (17/243) Salesforce: 2% (3/138)7% / 2%Research depthResearch depth Anthropic: 30% (74/243) Salesforce: 17% (24/138)30% / 17%Anthropic · Foundation training: 45% (109/243)Anthropic · Inference infra: 53% (130/243)Anthropic · Agent platform: 31% (76/243)Anthropic · Eval & safety: 64% (155/243)Anthropic · RAG / retrieval: 10% (24/243)Anthropic · Robotics + multimodal: 7% (17/243)Anthropic · Research depth: 30% (74/243)Salesforce · Foundation training: 12% (16/138)Salesforce · Inference infra: 26% (36/138)Salesforce · Agent platform: 94% (130/138)Salesforce · Eval & safety: 52% (72/138)Salesforce · RAG / retrieval: 31% (43/138)Salesforce · Robotics + multimodal: 2% (3/138)Salesforce · Research depth: 17% (24/138)Anthropic· 243 AI roles, 6 regulatedSalesforce· 138 AI roles, 11 regulated
Each axis = share of company’s tagged AI roles touching that capability cluster. Outer ring = 100%, inner ring = 25%. Hover any vertex for the underlying count.

Suggested comparisons