Company AI fingerprint

Two companies, six capability axes, one chart. Where each polygon bulges tells you what that company is actually building. The asymmetries — not the absolute values — are the story.

Company A:
Company B:
Foundation trainingFoundation training Anthropic: 45% (109/243) Scale AI: 35% (35/101)45% / 35%Inference infraInference infra Anthropic: 53% (130/243) Scale AI: 46% (46/101)53% / 46%Agent platformAgent platform Anthropic: 31% (76/243) Scale AI: 46% (46/101)31% / 46%Eval & safetyEval & safety Anthropic: 64% (155/243) Scale AI: 59% (60/101)64% / 59%RAG / retrievalRAG / retrieval Anthropic: 10% (24/243) Scale AI: 17% (17/101)10% / 17%Robotics + multimodalRobotics + multimodal Anthropic: 7% (17/243) Scale AI: 19% (19/101)7% / 19%Research depthResearch depth Anthropic: 30% (74/243) Scale AI: 28% (28/101)30% / 28%Anthropic · Foundation training: 45% (109/243)Anthropic · Inference infra: 53% (130/243)Anthropic · Agent platform: 31% (76/243)Anthropic · Eval & safety: 64% (155/243)Anthropic · RAG / retrieval: 10% (24/243)Anthropic · Robotics + multimodal: 7% (17/243)Anthropic · Research depth: 30% (74/243)Scale AI · Foundation training: 35% (35/101)Scale AI · Inference infra: 46% (46/101)Scale AI · Agent platform: 46% (46/101)Scale AI · Eval & safety: 59% (60/101)Scale AI · RAG / retrieval: 17% (17/101)Scale AI · Robotics + multimodal: 19% (19/101)Scale AI · Research depth: 28% (28/101)Anthropic· 243 AI roles, 6 regulatedScale AI· 101 AI roles, 9 regulated
Each axis = share of company’s tagged AI roles touching that capability cluster. Outer ring = 100%, inner ring = 25%. Hover any vertex for the underlying count.

Suggested comparisons