Company AI fingerprint

Two companies, six capability axes, one chart. Where each polygon bulges tells you what that company is actually building. The asymmetries — not the absolute values — are the story.

Company A:
Company B:
Foundation trainingFoundation training Anthropic: 45% (109/243) Visa: 30% (31/105)45% / 30%Inference infraInference infra Anthropic: 53% (130/243) Visa: 49% (51/105)53% / 49%Agent platformAgent platform Anthropic: 31% (76/243) Visa: 61% (64/105)31% / 61%Eval & safetyEval & safety Anthropic: 64% (155/243) Visa: 60% (63/105)64% / 60%RAG / retrievalRAG / retrieval Anthropic: 10% (24/243) Visa: 36% (38/105)10% / 36%Robotics + multimodalRobotics + multimodal Anthropic: 7% (17/243) Visa: 4% (4/105)7% / 4%Research depthResearch depth Anthropic: 30% (74/243) Visa: 10% (11/105)30% / 10%Anthropic · Foundation training: 45% (109/243)Anthropic · Inference infra: 53% (130/243)Anthropic · Agent platform: 31% (76/243)Anthropic · Eval & safety: 64% (155/243)Anthropic · RAG / retrieval: 10% (24/243)Anthropic · Robotics + multimodal: 7% (17/243)Anthropic · Research depth: 30% (74/243)Visa · Foundation training: 30% (31/105)Visa · Inference infra: 49% (51/105)Visa · Agent platform: 61% (64/105)Visa · Eval & safety: 60% (63/105)Visa · RAG / retrieval: 36% (38/105)Visa · Robotics + multimodal: 4% (4/105)Visa · Research depth: 10% (11/105)Anthropic· 243 AI roles, 6 regulatedVisa· 105 AI roles, 15 regulated
Each axis = share of company’s tagged AI roles touching that capability cluster. Outer ring = 100%, inner ring = 25%. Hover any vertex for the underlying count.

Suggested comparisons