Company AI fingerprint

Two companies, six capability axes, one chart. Where each polygon bulges tells you what that company is actually building. The asymmetries — not the absolute values — are the story.

Company A:
Company B:
Foundation trainingFoundation training Anthropic: 45% (109/243) xAI: 47% (44/93)45% / 47%Inference infraInference infra Anthropic: 53% (130/243) xAI: 19% (18/93)53% / 19%Agent platformAgent platform Anthropic: 31% (76/243) xAI: 14% (13/93)31% / 14%Eval & safetyEval & safety Anthropic: 64% (155/243) xAI: 29% (27/93)64% / 29%RAG / retrievalRAG / retrieval Anthropic: 10% (24/243) xAI: 2% (2/93)10% / 2%Robotics + multimodalRobotics + multimodal Anthropic: 7% (17/243) xAI: 53% (49/93)7% / 53%Research depthResearch depth Anthropic: 30% (74/243) xAI: 57% (53/93)30% / 57%Anthropic · Foundation training: 45% (109/243)Anthropic · Inference infra: 53% (130/243)Anthropic · Agent platform: 31% (76/243)Anthropic · Eval & safety: 64% (155/243)Anthropic · RAG / retrieval: 10% (24/243)Anthropic · Robotics + multimodal: 7% (17/243)Anthropic · Research depth: 30% (74/243)xAI · Foundation training: 47% (44/93)xAI · Inference infra: 19% (18/93)xAI · Agent platform: 14% (13/93)xAI · Eval & safety: 29% (27/93)xAI · RAG / retrieval: 2% (2/93)xAI · Robotics + multimodal: 53% (49/93)xAI · Research depth: 57% (53/93)Anthropic· 243 AI roles, 6 regulatedxAI· 93 AI roles, 2 regulated
Each axis = share of company’s tagged AI roles touching that capability cluster. Outer ring = 100%, inner ring = 25%. Hover any vertex for the underlying count.

Suggested comparisons