Company AI fingerprint

Two companies, six capability axes, one chart. Where each polygon bulges tells you what that company is actually building. The asymmetries — not the absolute values — are the story.

Company A:
Company B:
Foundation trainingFoundation training NVIDIA: 21% (109/530) Anthropic: 45% (109/243)21% / 45%Inference infraInference infra NVIDIA: 79% (420/530) Anthropic: 53% (130/243)79% / 53%Agent platformAgent platform NVIDIA: 32% (170/530) Anthropic: 31% (76/243)32% / 31%Eval & safetyEval & safety NVIDIA: 27% (141/530) Anthropic: 64% (155/243)27% / 64%RAG / retrievalRAG / retrieval NVIDIA: 12% (64/530) Anthropic: 10% (24/243)12% / 10%Robotics + multimodalRobotics + multimodal NVIDIA: 25% (134/530) Anthropic: 7% (17/243)25% / 7%Research depthResearch depth NVIDIA: 12% (64/530) Anthropic: 30% (74/243)12% / 30%NVIDIA · Foundation training: 21% (109/530)NVIDIA · Inference infra: 79% (420/530)NVIDIA · Agent platform: 32% (170/530)NVIDIA · Eval & safety: 27% (141/530)NVIDIA · RAG / retrieval: 12% (64/530)NVIDIA · Robotics + multimodal: 25% (134/530)NVIDIA · Research depth: 12% (64/530)Anthropic · Foundation training: 45% (109/243)Anthropic · Inference infra: 53% (130/243)Anthropic · Agent platform: 31% (76/243)Anthropic · Eval & safety: 64% (155/243)Anthropic · RAG / retrieval: 10% (24/243)Anthropic · Robotics + multimodal: 7% (17/243)Anthropic · Research depth: 30% (74/243)NVIDIA· 530 AI roles, 8 regulatedAnthropic· 243 AI roles, 6 regulated
Each axis = share of company’s tagged AI roles touching that capability cluster. Outer ring = 100%, inner ring = 25%. Hover any vertex for the underlying count.

Suggested comparisons