Company AI fingerprint

Two companies, six capability axes, one chart. Where each polygon bulges tells you what that company is actually building. The asymmetries — not the absolute values — are the story.

Company A:
Company B:
Foundation trainingFoundation training Salesforce: 12% (16/138) Anthropic: 45% (109/243)12% / 45%Inference infraInference infra Salesforce: 26% (36/138) Anthropic: 53% (130/243)26% / 53%Agent platformAgent platform Salesforce: 94% (130/138) Anthropic: 31% (76/243)94% / 31%Eval & safetyEval & safety Salesforce: 52% (72/138) Anthropic: 64% (155/243)52% / 64%RAG / retrievalRAG / retrieval Salesforce: 31% (43/138) Anthropic: 10% (24/243)31% / 10%Robotics + multimodalRobotics + multimodal Salesforce: 2% (3/138) Anthropic: 7% (17/243)2% / 7%Research depthResearch depth Salesforce: 17% (24/138) Anthropic: 30% (74/243)17% / 30%Salesforce · Foundation training: 12% (16/138)Salesforce · Inference infra: 26% (36/138)Salesforce · Agent platform: 94% (130/138)Salesforce · Eval & safety: 52% (72/138)Salesforce · RAG / retrieval: 31% (43/138)Salesforce · Robotics + multimodal: 2% (3/138)Salesforce · Research depth: 17% (24/138)Anthropic · Foundation training: 45% (109/243)Anthropic · Inference infra: 53% (130/243)Anthropic · Agent platform: 31% (76/243)Anthropic · Eval & safety: 64% (155/243)Anthropic · RAG / retrieval: 10% (24/243)Anthropic · Robotics + multimodal: 7% (17/243)Anthropic · Research depth: 30% (74/243)Salesforce· 138 AI roles, 11 regulatedAnthropic· 243 AI roles, 6 regulated
Each axis = share of company’s tagged AI roles touching that capability cluster. Outer ring = 100%, inner ring = 25%. Hover any vertex for the underlying count.

Suggested comparisons