Company AI fingerprint

Two companies, six capability axes, one chart. Where each polygon bulges tells you what that company is actually building. The asymmetries — not the absolute values — are the story.

Company A:
Company B:
Foundation trainingFoundation training Salesforce: 12% (16/139) Scale AI: 35% (35/101)12% / 35%Inference infraInference infra Salesforce: 27% (37/139) Scale AI: 46% (46/101)27% / 46%Agent platformAgent platform Salesforce: 94% (131/139) Scale AI: 46% (46/101)94% / 46%Eval & safetyEval & safety Salesforce: 53% (73/139) Scale AI: 59% (60/101)53% / 59%RAG / retrievalRAG / retrieval Salesforce: 31% (43/139) Scale AI: 17% (17/101)31% / 17%Robotics + multimodalRobotics + multimodal Salesforce: 2% (3/139) Scale AI: 19% (19/101)2% / 19%Research depthResearch depth Salesforce: 17% (24/139) Scale AI: 28% (28/101)17% / 28%Salesforce · Foundation training: 12% (16/139)Salesforce · Inference infra: 27% (37/139)Salesforce · Agent platform: 94% (131/139)Salesforce · Eval & safety: 53% (73/139)Salesforce · RAG / retrieval: 31% (43/139)Salesforce · Robotics + multimodal: 2% (3/139)Salesforce · Research depth: 17% (24/139)Scale AI · Foundation training: 35% (35/101)Scale AI · Inference infra: 46% (46/101)Scale AI · Agent platform: 46% (46/101)Scale AI · Eval & safety: 59% (60/101)Scale AI · RAG / retrieval: 17% (17/101)Scale AI · Robotics + multimodal: 19% (19/101)Scale AI · Research depth: 28% (28/101)Salesforce· 139 AI roles, 12 regulatedScale AI· 101 AI roles, 9 regulated
Each axis = share of company’s tagged AI roles touching that capability cluster. Outer ring = 100%, inner ring = 25%. Hover any vertex for the underlying count.

Suggested comparisons