Company AI fingerprint

Two companies, six capability axes, one chart. Where each polygon bulges tells you what that company is actually building. The asymmetries — not the absolute values — are the story.

Company A:
Company B:
Foundation trainingFoundation training Scale AI: 35% (35/101) Anthropic: 45% (109/243)35% / 45%Inference infraInference infra Scale AI: 46% (46/101) Anthropic: 53% (130/243)46% / 53%Agent platformAgent platform Scale AI: 46% (46/101) Anthropic: 31% (76/243)46% / 31%Eval & safetyEval & safety Scale AI: 59% (60/101) Anthropic: 64% (155/243)59% / 64%RAG / retrievalRAG / retrieval Scale AI: 17% (17/101) Anthropic: 10% (24/243)17% / 10%Robotics + multimodalRobotics + multimodal Scale AI: 19% (19/101) Anthropic: 7% (17/243)19% / 7%Research depthResearch depth Scale AI: 28% (28/101) Anthropic: 30% (74/243)28% / 30%Scale AI · Foundation training: 35% (35/101)Scale AI · Inference infra: 46% (46/101)Scale AI · Agent platform: 46% (46/101)Scale AI · Eval & safety: 59% (60/101)Scale AI · RAG / retrieval: 17% (17/101)Scale AI · Robotics + multimodal: 19% (19/101)Scale AI · Research depth: 28% (28/101)Anthropic · Foundation training: 45% (109/243)Anthropic · Inference infra: 53% (130/243)Anthropic · Agent platform: 31% (76/243)Anthropic · Eval & safety: 64% (155/243)Anthropic · RAG / retrieval: 10% (24/243)Anthropic · Robotics + multimodal: 7% (17/243)Anthropic · Research depth: 30% (74/243)Scale AI· 101 AI roles, 9 regulatedAnthropic· 243 AI roles, 6 regulated
Each axis = share of company’s tagged AI roles touching that capability cluster. Outer ring = 100%, inner ring = 25%. Hover any vertex for the underlying count.

Suggested comparisons