Company AI fingerprint

Two companies, six capability axes, one chart. Where each polygon bulges tells you what that company is actually building. The asymmetries — not the absolute values — are the story.

Company A:
Company B:
Foundation trainingFoundation training Visa: 30% (31/105) Anthropic: 45% (109/243)30% / 45%Inference infraInference infra Visa: 49% (51/105) Anthropic: 53% (130/243)49% / 53%Agent platformAgent platform Visa: 61% (64/105) Anthropic: 31% (76/243)61% / 31%Eval & safetyEval & safety Visa: 60% (63/105) Anthropic: 64% (155/243)60% / 64%RAG / retrievalRAG / retrieval Visa: 36% (38/105) Anthropic: 10% (24/243)36% / 10%Robotics + multimodalRobotics + multimodal Visa: 4% (4/105) Anthropic: 7% (17/243)4% / 7%Research depthResearch depth Visa: 10% (11/105) Anthropic: 30% (74/243)10% / 30%Visa · Foundation training: 30% (31/105)Visa · Inference infra: 49% (51/105)Visa · Agent platform: 61% (64/105)Visa · Eval & safety: 60% (63/105)Visa · RAG / retrieval: 36% (38/105)Visa · Robotics + multimodal: 4% (4/105)Visa · Research depth: 10% (11/105)Anthropic · Foundation training: 45% (109/243)Anthropic · Inference infra: 53% (130/243)Anthropic · Agent platform: 31% (76/243)Anthropic · Eval & safety: 64% (155/243)Anthropic · RAG / retrieval: 10% (24/243)Anthropic · Robotics + multimodal: 7% (17/243)Anthropic · Research depth: 30% (74/243)Visa· 105 AI roles, 15 regulatedAnthropic· 243 AI roles, 6 regulated
Each axis = share of company’s tagged AI roles touching that capability cluster. Outer ring = 100%, inner ring = 25%. Hover any vertex for the underlying count.

Suggested comparisons