Company AI fingerprint

Two companies, six capability axes, one chart. Where each polygon bulges tells you what that company is actually building. The asymmetries — not the absolute values — are the story.

Company A:
Company B:
Foundation trainingFoundation training xAI: 47% (44/93) Anthropic: 45% (109/243)47% / 45%Inference infraInference infra xAI: 19% (18/93) Anthropic: 53% (130/243)19% / 53%Agent platformAgent platform xAI: 14% (13/93) Anthropic: 31% (76/243)14% / 31%Eval & safetyEval & safety xAI: 29% (27/93) Anthropic: 64% (155/243)29% / 64%RAG / retrievalRAG / retrieval xAI: 2% (2/93) Anthropic: 10% (24/243)2% / 10%Robotics + multimodalRobotics + multimodal xAI: 53% (49/93) Anthropic: 7% (17/243)53% / 7%Research depthResearch depth xAI: 57% (53/93) Anthropic: 30% (74/243)57% / 30%xAI · Foundation training: 47% (44/93)xAI · Inference infra: 19% (18/93)xAI · Agent platform: 14% (13/93)xAI · Eval & safety: 29% (27/93)xAI · RAG / retrieval: 2% (2/93)xAI · Robotics + multimodal: 53% (49/93)xAI · Research depth: 57% (53/93)Anthropic · Foundation training: 45% (109/243)Anthropic · Inference infra: 53% (130/243)Anthropic · Agent platform: 31% (76/243)Anthropic · Eval & safety: 64% (155/243)Anthropic · RAG / retrieval: 10% (24/243)Anthropic · Robotics + multimodal: 7% (17/243)Anthropic · Research depth: 30% (74/243)xAI· 93 AI roles, 2 regulatedAnthropic· 243 AI roles, 6 regulated
Each axis = share of company’s tagged AI roles touching that capability cluster. Outer ring = 100%, inner ring = 25%. Hover any vertex for the underlying count.

Suggested comparisons