Company AI fingerprint

Two companies, six capability axes, one chart. Where each polygon bulges tells you what that company is actually building. The asymmetries — not the absolute values — are the story.

Company A:
Company B:
Foundation trainingFoundation training xAI: 47% (44/93) Salesforce: 12% (16/138)47% / 12%Inference infraInference infra xAI: 19% (18/93) Salesforce: 26% (36/138)19% / 26%Agent platformAgent platform xAI: 14% (13/93) Salesforce: 94% (130/138)14% / 94%Eval & safetyEval & safety xAI: 29% (27/93) Salesforce: 52% (72/138)29% / 52%RAG / retrievalRAG / retrieval xAI: 2% (2/93) Salesforce: 31% (43/138)2% / 31%Robotics + multimodalRobotics + multimodal xAI: 53% (49/93) Salesforce: 2% (3/138)53% / 2%Research depthResearch depth xAI: 57% (53/93) Salesforce: 17% (24/138)57% / 17%xAI · Foundation training: 47% (44/93)xAI · Inference infra: 19% (18/93)xAI · Agent platform: 14% (13/93)xAI · Eval & safety: 29% (27/93)xAI · RAG / retrieval: 2% (2/93)xAI · Robotics + multimodal: 53% (49/93)xAI · Research depth: 57% (53/93)Salesforce · Foundation training: 12% (16/138)Salesforce · Inference infra: 26% (36/138)Salesforce · Agent platform: 94% (130/138)Salesforce · Eval & safety: 52% (72/138)Salesforce · RAG / retrieval: 31% (43/138)Salesforce · Robotics + multimodal: 2% (3/138)Salesforce · Research depth: 17% (24/138)xAI· 93 AI roles, 2 regulatedSalesforce· 138 AI roles, 11 regulated
Each axis = share of company’s tagged AI roles touching that capability cluster. Outer ring = 100%, inner ring = 25%. Hover any vertex for the underlying count.

Suggested comparisons