Company AI fingerprint

Two companies, six capability axes, one chart. Where each polygon bulges tells you what that company is actually building. The asymmetries — not the absolute values — are the story.

Company A:
Company B:
Foundation trainingFoundation training xAI: 47% (44/93) Scale AI: 35% (35/101)47% / 35%Inference infraInference infra xAI: 19% (18/93) Scale AI: 46% (46/101)19% / 46%Agent platformAgent platform xAI: 14% (13/93) Scale AI: 46% (46/101)14% / 46%Eval & safetyEval & safety xAI: 29% (27/93) Scale AI: 59% (60/101)29% / 59%RAG / retrievalRAG / retrieval xAI: 2% (2/93) Scale AI: 17% (17/101)2% / 17%Robotics + multimodalRobotics + multimodal xAI: 53% (49/93) Scale AI: 19% (19/101)53% / 19%Research depthResearch depth xAI: 57% (53/93) Scale AI: 28% (28/101)57% / 28%xAI · Foundation training: 47% (44/93)xAI · Inference infra: 19% (18/93)xAI · Agent platform: 14% (13/93)xAI · Eval & safety: 29% (27/93)xAI · RAG / retrieval: 2% (2/93)xAI · Robotics + multimodal: 53% (49/93)xAI · Research depth: 57% (53/93)Scale AI · Foundation training: 35% (35/101)Scale AI · Inference infra: 46% (46/101)Scale AI · Agent platform: 46% (46/101)Scale AI · Eval & safety: 59% (60/101)Scale AI · RAG / retrieval: 17% (17/101)Scale AI · Robotics + multimodal: 19% (19/101)Scale AI · Research depth: 28% (28/101)xAI· 93 AI roles, 2 regulatedScale AI· 101 AI roles, 9 regulated
Each axis = share of company’s tagged AI roles touching that capability cluster. Outer ring = 100%, inner ring = 25%. Hover any vertex for the underlying count.

Suggested comparisons