Senior Legal Counsel, Safety, Content & Law Enforcement (japac)

xAI xAI · AI Frontier · Singapore · G&A

This role is for a Senior Legal Counsel focused on Safety, Content, and Law Enforcement for the JAPAC region at xAI. The position involves advising teams on legal demands for user data disclosure and content removal, identifying legal risks, developing policies for legal compliance, and providing feedback on legislative proposals. The role requires a lawyer with experience in internet-based technology and a strong understanding of user privacy, freedom of expression, and online safety, particularly in a rapidly evolving legal landscape.

What you'd actually do

  1. You will primarily be responsible for advising the teams that respond to legal demands to disclose user data and for content removal, whether these requests originate from governmental entities or private parties.
  2. You will play a key role in identifying legal risks associated with requests for user data, requests for content removal, and efforts to curb online abuse and enforce the X Rules.
  3. You will collaborate with team members in other regions regarding alignment of X policies and operationalizing legal requirements.
  4. You will advise on the development of policies designed to ensure compliance with legal obligations consistent with X’s customer commitments and work closely with colleagues to update existing policies in alignment with our maturity as a company.
  5. You will provide feedback to internal colleagues on legislative proposals from governments that impact X’s content moderation policies and obligations to produce user data to law enforcement and government entities.

Skills

Required

  • J.D. equivalent and qualified to practice law in at least one jurisdiction in the JAPAC region or the United States
  • At least 6+ years of legal experience
  • Knowledge of and experience with criminal investigative process and third-party civil demands
  • Knowledge of human rights law

Nice to have

  • Passionate and enthusiastic about protecting user privacy, freedom of expression, and online safety
  • Comfortable operating thoughtfully, at times, quickly, and working on cutting-edge legal and policy matters where there is ambiguity and a lack of legal precedent
  • Ability to adapt quickly as the legal, policy, and factual landscape continues to change
  • Familiarity with internet-based communications technology, cloud services and the related legal issues
  • Self-starter who is eager to learn and works well with minimal supervision, but shows excellent judgment about when to look to managers and teammates for guidance
  • Demonstrated ability to think creatively about solutions and devise long-term strategies
  • Ability to work effectively in cross-functional, geographically diverse, multi-cultural teams and be open-minded, inclusive, and flexible
  • Ability to quickly assess emerging situations and develop practical options to respond
  • Willingness to experiment and try new things and learn quickly from failure and mistakes
  • Responses display legal knowledge, common sense, and sound judgment
  • Prioritize the success of your clients and other stakeholders and recognise that their success is also key to your success
  • Communicate clearly orally and in writing to legal and non-legal audiences
  • Excellent organizational skills and the ability to effectively prioritize multiple projects simultaneously

What the JD emphasized

  • legal demands to disclose user data
  • content removal
  • governmental entities
  • private parties
  • legal risks
  • online abuse
  • X’s Rules and Terms of Service
  • legal requirements
  • legal obligations
  • legislative proposals
  • content moderation policies
  • user data to law enforcement
  • government entities
  • product and design initiatives
  • user privacy
  • freedom of expression
  • online safety
  • cutting-edge legal and policy matters
  • ambiguity
  • lack of legal precedent
  • internet-based communications technology
  • cloud services
  • criminal investigative process
  • third-party civil demands
  • human rights law