Senior Specialist, Global Clinical Evaluation - Medtech Surgery

Johnson & Johnson Johnson & Johnson · Pharma · Raritan, NJ +2

This role focuses on operational excellence in clinical evaluation for MedTech Surgery, involving systematic literature reviews, data appraisal, and medical writing for regulatory documents. It requires process improvement, training, and collaboration with cross-functional teams, with a mention of AI-driven solutions as a potential integration point.

What you'd actually do

  1. Drives continuous process improvement of Global Clinical Evaluation processes with focus on improving, automating, and standardizing literature searching and reporting, staying current with industry, notified body, and global regulatory agency trends and best practices in training, education, and knowledge enablement
  2. Creates and delivers training to Global Clinical Evaluation and other departments, as applicable, concerning the activities of Global Clinical Evaluation, results of activities, strategic/quality initiatives, etc.
  3. Owns the end-to-end planning and execution of all assigned Global Clinical Evaluation deliverables (e.g., protocols, reports, regulatory responses)
  4. Ensures timely delivery of high-quality services and documentation as well as consistent deployment across MedTech Surgery
  5. Manages the utilization and integration of platforms and software supporting systematic literature reviews including statistical analysis tools

Skills

Required

  • BA/BS required; advanced degree preferred
  • 6+ years of experience in EUMDR, clinical evaluation reports, systematic literature reviews, or directly related regulatory/clinical field required
  • Demonstrated knowledge and experience in narrative or systematic literature reviews (e.g., PRISMA, Cochrane) with qualitative and quantitative synthesis in conjunction with scientific rigor

What the JD emphasized

  • all applicable regulations, procedures, and guidelines
  • global regulatory agency trends
  • EUMDR
  • clinical evaluation reports
  • systematic literature reviews